YoungMoneyVEVO asked:

Music video by Young Money performing Roger That. (C) 2010 Cash Money Records Inc.

Michael Moore Movies on WordPress

HipHopRapper420 asked:

i hope u guyz enjoy it! plz sub 4 this hot track!!!! thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Young Money – Roger That Young Money – Roger That Young Money – Roger That Young Money – Roger That Young Money – Roger That Young Money – Roger That Young Money – Roger That“

Michael Moore Movies on WordPress

PrinceBowWow asked:

Bow wow “In studio Performance” “Roger That” Shout out to Hotnewhiphop.com Dj Ill Will & Dj Rockstar

roger & me

YoungMoneySite asked:

“ROGER THAT” – YOUNG MONEY MUSIC VIDEO (BEHIND THE SCENES)

roger & me

Elwing06 asked:

Roger Federer vs andy roddick

Michael Moore Movies on WordPress

SenatorWicker asked:

Senator Wicker discusses the oil spill, the President’s visit to Mississippi, shallow water drilling, and the war in Afghanistan.

roger & me

SenatorWicker asked:

On Wednesday, June 16th, 2010, Senator Wicker Discusses the President’s address on the oil spill on MSNBC with Tamron Hall.

roger & me

Lance Winslow asked:




Michael Moore has made huge amounts of money sensationalizing the anti-capitalist movement amongst his most staunch and steadfast liberal-socialist viewers. He has created documentaries, movies, films, and even written books that cater to the notion that capitalism is bad. This is completely hilarious and somewhat outrageous when you really think about it, especially considering that Michael Moore makes money creating content that his viewers desire, even if the content he produces isn’t true. He’s a capitalist, pure and simple.

In essence Michael Moore says he dislikes how capitalism is working in practice, in the real world, but makes money as a capitalist, yet, continues to trash it. How does that work exactly? Michael Moore says it’s not fair for business owners to make lots of money, he says that businesses should also do good, do good for the country, and do good for the welfare of all citizens.

Interestingly enough, this was Adolf Hitler’s belief when he slowly took over the most profitable companies and hired back the owners of those companies after he nationalized them to run the companies as managers. In fact, they became employees of the state, and did not have a choice, in essence they were slaves.

Indeed, I find Michael Moore’s arguments and those of Adolf ****** outrageous because capitalists make money by giving people what they want. And people pay with a unit of trade that we call a dollar for the things that the capitalists create for them. Therefore, the capitalist has already given to society, by making available what people wanted.

Moore thinks they shouldn’t be allowed to make that much money, but rather give the money back and spread the wealth for the common good of all. Not only is his logic and argument fundamentally flawed, but what he’s suggesting is that we should ditch capitalism for some sort of Michael Moore “Socialism-Capitalism Hybrid” but the problem is that the two concepts were theories are 180-degrees apart.

You cannot force capitalism into a Socialism model, or one which is controlled by the state dictating price controls, production, and labor costs. Businesses don’t work that way in the free market system, and if we dismantle the free-market system then production will go to hell, there will be shortages, and there will be a middle class because everyone will be poor.

Why should we listen to M. Moore who wants to bring about the “Ayn Rand Affect” exactly what she warned us about by destroying businesses and limiting capitalists to what he believes might be a fair amount of money they’re allowed to make? That’s insane in my opinion, actually this entire articles is my opinion, and I trust it more than Moore’s.

Michael Moore Movies on WordPress

Lance Winslow asked:




Michael Moore has made huge amounts of money sensationalizing the anti-capitalist movement amongst his most staunch and steadfast liberal-socialist viewers. He has created documentaries, movies, films, and even written books that cater to the notion that capitalism is bad. This is completely hilarious and somewhat outrageous when you really think about it, especially considering that Michael Moore makes money creating content that his viewers desire, even if the content he produces isn’t true. He’s a capitalist, pure and simple.

In essence Michael Moore says he dislikes how capitalism is working in practice, in the real world, but makes money as a capitalist, yet, continues to trash it. How does that work exactly? Michael Moore says it’s not fair for business owners to make lots of money, he says that businesses should also do good, do good for the country, and do good for the welfare of all citizens.

Interestingly enough, this was Adolf Hitler’s belief when he slowly took over the most profitable companies and hired back the owners of those companies after he nationalized them to run the companies as managers. In fact, they became employees of the state, and did not have a choice, in essence they were slaves.

Indeed, I find Michael Moore’s arguments and those of Adolf ****** outrageous because capitalists make money by giving people what they want. And people pay with a unit of trade that we call a dollar for the things that the capitalists create for them. Therefore, the capitalist has already given to society, by making available what people wanted.

Moore thinks they shouldn’t be allowed to make that much money, but rather give the money back and spread the wealth for the common good of all. Not only is his logic and argument fundamentally flawed, but what he’s suggesting is that we should ditch capitalism for some sort of Michael Moore “Socialism-Capitalism Hybrid” but the problem is that the two concepts were theories are 180-degrees apart.

You cannot force capitalism into a Socialism model, or one which is controlled by the state dictating price controls, production, and labor costs. Businesses don’t work that way in the free market system, and if we dismantle the free-market system then production will go to hell, there will be shortages, and there will be a middle class because everyone will be poor.

Why should we listen to M. Moore who wants to bring about the “Ayn Rand Affect” exactly what she warned us about by destroying businesses and limiting capitalists to what he believes might be a fair amount of money they’re allowed to make? That’s insane in my opinion, actually this entire articles is my opinion, and I trust it more than Moore’s.

michael moore

Chris Jacob asked:




Hillary Clinton is the former First Lady and Current Senator from NY. There is no politician that polarizes opinions in the US more and from my observations that is more misunderstood around the globe and even in a little the US. The reason why Hillary tends to be understood outside the US is really the media’s fault and the way she is portrayed and the limited access to information. Most average people know her as Bill’s wife who was the victim during the *** scandals of the 90s and now as strong woman Senator who has the best chance yet of a female leading the US. In some ways this is true but in reality Hillary more resembles Mitt Romney on the Republican side as someone who is very calculating and changes opinion based on situation and polls (her Iraq positions and current stance on Iran and voting in Senate about Iran).

In 90s unsuccessfully tried to bring a universal health care campaign to US under Bill’s reign and now has put forward a new plan under her current campaign. However she is the only major Democratic candidate who receives massive donation from Drug and Health Insurance companies (more than any Republican actually even) and these are the people she lampooned in the 90s and she must fight and essentially take away billions of dollars in profits from to bring any universal health care plan forward. She has a carefully crafted PR image a strong decisive woman not afraid to make tough decisions and that she can operate in a male dominated world, but has stayed with Bill despite 20 years of documented infidelity with numerous women essentially for political reasons.

In fairness to her she has to operate in a system where a single man let alone a single women on any side would probably be unelectable. She has been re-elected as a senator with a massive majority in NY and generally performs well in debates and also has improved her public speaking delivery (you have to feel sorry for he as she is compared to Bill and rival Barack Obama who are both dynamic on the big stage making her look awkward by comparison as most people would). She is the consummate politician with her vague answers and has strong experience on the global stage and would have an amazing advisor in her corner in Bill.

However if elected would represent at least 24 and potentially 28 years of presidency passing between 2 families and most likely more of the same if not more vicious bickering that occurred in the 90s. She would represent a giant leap forward showing that a women is electable but as I said the reasons why people seem to **** her are largely unfounded as as the reasons that people like her as they are based on misinformed assumptions and inaccurate facts. She is the candidate that many Republicans are hoping for as she could energise their base better than they could themselves and she is also despised by the ******** left of her party as drifting to far right and conservatively economically. Is the overall favorite and the candidate talked about the most on both sides by far. (expect a lot of documentary Michael Moore style movies anti-Hillary to come out next year if she is the Democrat nominee which are in production now in anticipation).

Michael Moore Movies on WordPress